Opportunity made Moses, Cyrus, Romulus, Theseus, and others; their virtue domi-nated the opportunity, making their homelands noble and happy. However, once you get past that, it is filled with many parallels and contrasts to today. I first read this book when studying economic history at high school in the second half of the last century. I did not have the required level of vocabulary that was needed at that time to really understand what was happening in the book. He seems to be of the opinion that the ends justifies the means no matter the cost. He is a figure of the Italian Renaissance and a central figure of its political component, most widely known for his treatises on realist political theory The Prince on the one hand and republicanism Discourses on Livy on the other. Here's his advice on conquering self-governing states i.
It stands out perhaps on two grounds, one it completely avoids conventional Christian morality or conventional Christian moral authorities but then as far as I recall so does Commynes , and more interestingly he makes the point that for the Prince, private virtues make for public vices, or as one observes of boy scouts, there is no point in doing a good deed unless they are certain that they are going to be observed and that a favourable report will reach the ears of the troop leader. Machiavelli closes each chapter with a brief summary of these issues and the way a Prince with virtue and skill would handle the situation. ويعد من أوائل الكتب في علم السياسية. However, in the associated groups conflicts arise, since in each group, the individual until then seeks their own interests. See my first quote above: yeah, we've tried that.
حتى يزيد من امتنان الرعيه له. Written in exile to advertise his skills to the Florentine Medici regime in the hope of returning to political office Machiavelli recommends that a prince keeps two key groups on side: the people, and the nobles, in order to keep the people on side he recommends that you don't rob them too much and to avoid dishonouring their women. Italy at the time was a collection of warring states, not united. Phdify saved me from a total disaster, and now I have my PhD. Even fortresses are useless if the prince does not have the support of his people. Literally, within the historical context, an original copy of the first publication of the book was given as a gift to Lorenzo de Medici.
There is politics involved in all management. Someone who is already a prince would need to know about what to do after the conquest. Despite his lengthy discussions on certain topics, The Prince is a very quick read, only about one hundred pages long. But in reality, princes who distance themselves from ethical concerns and do whatever it takes for the benefit of their states rules the best. اما کسایی که سعی می کنن به هر طریق نزد شهریار اعتباری کسب کنن، از زمره ی جاه طلب هایی هستن که منافع خودشون رو بر منافع شهریار مقدم می دونن، پس باید ازشون ترسید. ولذلك يعتبر الكتاب من اهم المراجع فى فنون السياسة والحكم واسالبيب النفوذ والسلطان ونبدأ ب عند الانتهاء من قراءة الكتاب كنت محتاراً فى تقييمه هل اقييمه تقييم عالي لمحتوي الكتاب من دراسة شاملة وافية للمجتمعات وعلاقتها بالحاكم وأمثلة من التاريخ لكل رأي أو نصيحه كتبها مكيافيللي وبين ان الدراسة او هذا الفكر مكتوب لسبب واحد فقط وليخدم فرد واحد فقط وهو الحاكم.
Mercenaries are disloyal and divided; foreign auxiliaries come already united under another master, and so are in a way even more dangerous. The prince himself should be a student of war and an avid reader of military history. Fear is useful hatred is counterproductive. Everyone is stunned that it was Machiavelli. من السهل ان يكسب الأمير جانبهم بكل سهولة لأنهم اشد اضطرارا الى خدمته بإخلاص يجب ان ينزع الأمير السلاح من كل فرد فى الإمارة إلا من ساعد الأمير على احتلالها ولكن بعد ذلك يجب ان ينزع منهم السلاح بل ويضعفهم ويجعلهم مخنثين. He speaks of being cunning and virtuous to keep a principality, but in doing so, one must betray even their own friends, because one cannot trust even those closest to you. What are your great ideas? The history can predict future events and use the same old ways, or in failing, that creates other forms of action.
More importantly, and less traditionally, he distinguishes new princedoms from hereditary established princedoms. . Those can be called well used if it is permissible to speak well of evil that are done at a stroke, out of the necessity to secure oneself, and then are not persisted in but are turned to as much utility for the subjects as one can. Since he is a sort of book-worshipper, he won't I don't know how come I never reviewed this one but recently I was visiting this friend of mine in south India, Pramod yes, the one from Goodreads , when he showed me this not-so-popular smaller piece, allegedly written by the author in his last days, 'Le Gente' and never published - for common people about how they can succeed in social life using diplomacy. That was the context in which Machiavelli wrote this book. His focus is evident in his brief introduction of existing principalities and the clear statement that the majority of his writings will be towards all aspects of acquiring and maintaining new principalities.
His book effectively demonstrates the different ways you can arise to these powers, how to control groups and obtain new principalities within the kingdom. Machiavelli, while advocating an oligarchy in leadership and not a democracy, provides the Prince as a handbook for leadership, not for the faint of heart, and not for the morally virtuous. It delivers on what it promises - how a person can gain and acquire power and keep it, and the sometimes ruthless actions necessary to maintain it and protect one's own self. If a Prince is not given to vices that make him hated, it is unsusal for his subjects to show their affection for him. Niccolo considered reality was self evident but in fact it is not it is covered by disguise and people play around with it.
وحتي اذا نصح مكيافيللي الأمير ان يفعل اى شئ لصالح شعبه فهو ينصحه بذلك فقط فى اوقات محددة خوفاً من ثورة شعبه عليه وخلعه من الحكم. Homo hominis lupus The man is the wolf of the man. Moreover, the writing style and some of the words used, suggest a later day authorship. However, after reading it when I myself was in high school, I found a broader understanding. زیرا آنها جز بدی و زیان، چیزی به بار نخواهند آورد. My recollection is that Machiavelli The prince is a frank exposition on the division between the idealism we profess and the reality that we live.